Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Alexander, 10-7161 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-7161 Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 28, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7161 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DEVON L. ALEXANDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:06-cr-00118-WDK-TEM-1) Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Devon L. Alexander, Appel
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7161 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DEVON L. ALEXANDER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (4:06-cr-00118-WDK-TEM-1) Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 28, 2010 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Devon L. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Devon L. Alexander appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to dismiss his indictment and motion to reconsider. The district court also considered Alexander’s motion as one for a new trial under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Alexander, No. 4:06-cr-00118-WDK-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. June 23, 2010 & July 13, 2010). We deny Alexander’s motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer