Filed: Dec. 29, 2010
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7286 MICHAEL LEROY CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY W. POWERS; WILLIAM CHURCH, Lt.; OFFICER KUNNAK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:07-cv-04012-HFF) Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinio
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7286 MICHAEL LEROY CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY W. POWERS; WILLIAM CHURCH, Lt.; OFFICER KUNNAK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (4:07-cv-04012-HFF) Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010 Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7286
MICHAEL LEROY CAMPBELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LARRY W. POWERS; WILLIAM CHURCH, Lt.; OFFICER KUNNAK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(4:07-cv-04012-HFF)
Submitted: December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Leroy Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin,
HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Leroy Campbell appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for an extension of time in which to
appeal the court’s previous denial of relief on Campbell’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order and deny Campbell’s motion to assign counsel.
Campbell v. Powers, No. 4:07-cv-04012-HFF (D.S.C. Aug. 30,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2