WARREN v. GREEN, 10-6790. (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20101206084
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 06, 2010
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2010
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jasper Maurice Warren appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Green , No. 1:09-cv-01308-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 30, 2010). Warren's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal co
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jasper Maurice Warren appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Green , No. 1:09-cv-01308-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 30, 2010). Warren's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal con..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jasper Maurice Warren appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Warren v. Green, No. 1:09-cv-01308-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 30, 2010). Warren's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
