Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Silvious v. AFNI, Incorporated, 09-2164A (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 09-2164A Visitors: 26
Filed: May 26, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: ON REHEARING UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2164 OWEN FRANKLIN SILVIOUS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AFNI, INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee, and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED; ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; ACCOUNT SERVICES; APPLIED CARD BANK; CREDIGY RECEIVABLES, INCORPORATED; CREDIT ONE BANK; LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, LP, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Freder
More
ON REHEARING UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2164 OWEN FRANKLIN SILVIOUS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. AFNI, INCORPORATED, Defendant – Appellee, and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED; ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INCORPORATED; ACCOUNT SERVICES; APPLIED CARD BANK; CREDIGY RECEIVABLES, INCORPORATED; CREDIT ONE BANK; LTD FINANCIAL SERVICES, LP, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00145-FPS-JES) Submitted: April 15, 2011 Decided: May 26, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Owen Franklin Silvious, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Todd Booth, BOOTH & MCCARTHY, Bridgeport, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Owen Franklin Silvious appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant, and granting the motion to strike Silvious’ surreply. Silvious also appeals the denial of his post-judgment motion for additional findings, filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(b). Following our grant of rehearing, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Silvious v. AFNI, Inc., No. 5:07-cv-00145-FPS- JES (N.D. W. Va. Aug. 3, 2009; Sept. 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer