Filed: Feb. 16, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2236 MICHAEL C. BUTTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:08-cv-01963-AW) Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011 Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affir
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-2236 MICHAEL C. BUTTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:08-cv-01963-AW) Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011 Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirm..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2236
MICHAEL C. BUTTS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air
Force,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:08-cv-01963-AW)
Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011
Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel K. Gebhardt, Charles W. Day, Jr., GEBHARDT & ASSOCIATES,
LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United
States Attorney, Melanie L. Glickson, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael C. Butts appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on his race and
age discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2010), and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621 to 634
(West 2008 & Supp. 2010), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f)
motion for discovery. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See Butts v. Donley, No. 8:08-cv-01963-AW (D. Md. Aug.
28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2