Filed: Mar. 04, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7895 STONEY WILLIAM AULT, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TERESA WAID, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-00088-REM-JSK) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7895 STONEY WILLIAM AULT, Petitioner - Appellant, v. TERESA WAID, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-00088-REM-JSK) Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011 Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7895
STONEY WILLIAM AULT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TERESA WAID, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (2:07-cv-00088-REM-JSK)
Submitted: February 28, 2011 Decided: March 4, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stoney William Ault, Appellant Pro Se. Robert David Goldberg,
Assistant Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Stoney William Ault appeals district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ault v.
Waid, No. 2:07-cv-00088-REM-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 16, 2009).
We also deny Ault’s motion to seal the record on appeal. Local
Rule 25(c)(2). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2