Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Stevenson v. Kwiecinski, 10-1962 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-1962 Visitors: 42
Filed: Feb. 16, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1962 AARON A. STEVENSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JAMIE A. KWIECINSKI; DWIGHT W. AYERS; ATLAS GASKINS, in his official capacity as Chief of Police, Roanoke City Police Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cv-00525-gec) Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011 Before WILKIN
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1962 AARON A. STEVENSON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JAMIE A. KWIECINSKI; DWIGHT W. AYERS; ATLAS GASKINS, in his official capacity as Chief of Police, Roanoke City Police Department, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:09-cv-00525-gec) Submitted: February 10, 2011 Decided: February 16, 2011 Before WILKINSON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron A. Stevenson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Ross Spencer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aaron A. Stevenson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions for summary judgment and denying his motion for summary judgment in his civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stevenson v. Kwiecinski, No. 7:09-cv-00525-gec (W.D. Va. July 23, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer