Filed: Jan. 25, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1978 EVELYN L. MIDDLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS) Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 25, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-1978 EVELYN L. MIDDLETON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS) Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 25, 2011 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1978
EVELYN L. MIDDLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 25, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evelyn L. Middleton, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn Middleton appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her 28 U.S.C. § 2042 (2006) action for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Middleton v. United States, No. 4:10-cv-00088-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va.
Aug. 19, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2