Filed: Apr. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2157 ROBERT E. GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. David W. Daniel, Magistrate Judge. (4:09-cv-00037-DAN) Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 20, 2011 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2157 ROBERT E. GIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. David W. Daniel, Magistrate Judge. (4:09-cv-00037-DAN) Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 20, 2011 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2157
ROBERT E. GIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal
Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. David W. Daniel,
Magistrate Judge. (4:09-cv-00037-DAN)
Submitted: April 11, 2011 Decided: April 20, 2011
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert E. Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Neal Fowler,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Tobin Webb Lathan, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert E. Gibbs appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting Postmaster General John Potter’s motion to dismiss
Gibbs’ civil action arising out of his former employment with
the United States Postal Service. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge. * Gibbs v. Potter, No.
4:09-cv-00037-DAN (E.D.N.C. Sept. 27, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s
jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
2