Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Christian v. Vought Aircraft Industries, 10-2302 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 10-2302 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jul. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2302 JOSEPH H. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VOUGHT AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED; VOUGHT AIRCRAFT SALARIED DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00186-FL) Submitted: May 31, 2011 Decided: July 20, 2011 Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMI
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-2302 JOSEPH H. CHRISTIAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. VOUGHT AIRCRAFT INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED; VOUGHT AIRCRAFT SALARIED DISABILITY INCOME PLAN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00186-FL) Submitted: May 31, 2011 Decided: July 20, 2011 Before GREGORY and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph H. Christian, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Elliott, Ellen L. Perlioni, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Dallas, Texas; Kevin Scott Joyner, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph H. Christian appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Christian v. Vought Aircraft Indus., Inc., No. 5:09-cv-00186-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer