Filed: Feb. 28, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6512 JAY SPECTER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, EDGEFIELD SATELLITE PRISON CAMP, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00191-TLW) Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-6512 JAY SPECTER, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, EDGEFIELD SATELLITE PRISON CAMP, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:09-cv-00191-TLW) Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished p..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-6512
JAY SPECTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; WARDEN, EDGEFIELD
SATELLITE PRISON CAMP,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(4:09-cv-00191-TLW)
Submitted: February 24, 2011 Decided: February 28, 2011
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Specter, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United
States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jay Specter, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp.
2010) petition. Specter sought placement in a residential
reentry center at least twelve months before his release date.
Because Specter has been released, this appeal has become moot
and must be dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2