Filed: May 27, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7485 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH MARION HEAD, JR., Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (4:98-cr-00102-MR-1; 1:10-cv-00197-MR) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 27, 2011 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7485 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH MARION HEAD, JR., Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (4:98-cr-00102-MR-1; 1:10-cv-00197-MR) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 27, 2011 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublish..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7485 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH MARION HEAD, JR., Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (4:98-cr-00102-MR-1; 1:10-cv-00197-MR) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 27, 2011 Before MOTZ and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Marion Head, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Marion Head, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action as improvidently filed and docketed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Head, Nos. 4:98-cr-00102-MR-1; 1:10-cv-00197-MR (W.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2010). We deny the motions for appointment of counsel and for copies of records and briefs and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2