Filed: May 31, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7710 MARINOS GELARDOS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KENDRA BURR, Chief Nurse and Medical Administrator of Medical at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; ALVIN HARRIS, Dr. at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; MICHAEL BROWN, Capt. at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; THOMAS SAWYER, Major at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; W. W. PIXLEY, Warden at St. Brides Corr. Ctr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7710 MARINOS GELARDOS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. KENDRA BURR, Chief Nurse and Medical Administrator of Medical at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; ALVIN HARRIS, Dr. at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; MICHAEL BROWN, Capt. at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; THOMAS SAWYER, Major at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; W. W. PIXLEY, Warden at St. Brides Corr. Ctr., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7710
MARINOS GELARDOS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KENDRA BURR, Chief Nurse and Medical Administrator of
Medical at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; ALVIN HARRIS, Dr. at St.
Brides Corr. Ctr.; MICHAEL BROWN, Capt. at St. Brides Corr.
Ctr.; THOMAS SAWYER, Major at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.; W. W.
PIXLEY, Warden at St. Brides Corr. Ctr.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00494-RLW)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marinos Gelardos, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Marinos Gelardos appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2006), for failure to pay the partial filing fee. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Gelardos v. Johnson, No. 3:10-cv-00494-RLW (E.D. Va. Nov. 23,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2