Filed: Dec. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7766 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHERIN, Warden; V. LOIBEL MESTROON, Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-01404-AW) Submitted: November 29, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011 Before DAVIS, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bra
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 10-7766 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHERIN, Warden; V. LOIBEL MESTROON, Supervisor, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:09-cv-01404-AW) Submitted: November 29, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011 Before DAVIS, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bran..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7766
BRANDON ROBERTS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BOBBY P. SHERIN, Warden; V. LOIBEL MESTROON, Supervisor,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:09-cv-01404-AW)
Submitted: November 29, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011
Before DAVIS, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and
denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Roberts v. Sherin, No.
8:09-cv-01404-AW (D. Md. Sept. 7, 2010; entered Nov. 30, 2010 &
filed Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2