Filed: May 05, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1017 ELSIBETH BRANDEE MCCOY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STEVE CANTERBURY, Administrative Director for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, Defendant – Appellee, and SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA; CABELL COUNTY COURTHOUSE; BARBRA WILLS, Courthouse Administrator, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Jud
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1017 ELSIBETH BRANDEE MCCOY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. STEVE CANTERBURY, Administrative Director for Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia, Defendant – Appellee, and SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA; CABELL COUNTY COURTHOUSE; BARBRA WILLS, Courthouse Administrator, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judg..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1017
ELSIBETH BRANDEE MCCOY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STEVE CANTERBURY, Administrative Director for Supreme Court
of Appeals of West Virginia,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA; CABELL COUNTY
COURTHOUSE; BARBRA WILLS, Courthouse Administrator,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00368)
Submitted: May 2, 2011 Decided: May 5, 2011
Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elsibeth Brandee McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. John Michael Hedges,
Stephanie Shepherd, BYRNE, HEDGES & LYONS, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Elsibeth Brandee McCoy appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her action filed under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(West 2003 & Supp. 2010). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for
the reasons stated by the district court. McCoy v. Canterbury,
No. 3:10-cv-00368 (S.D. W. Va. Dec. 20 & 21, 2010). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3