Filed: Dec. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1730 XULI ZHANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INCORPORATED; THOMAS STEWART, Defendants - Appellees, and ROSS STORE, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01328-TSE-IDD) Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affi
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1730 XULI ZHANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INCORPORATED; THOMAS STEWART, Defendants - Appellees, and ROSS STORE, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01328-TSE-IDD) Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affir..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1730 XULI ZHANG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INCORPORATED; THOMAS STEWART, Defendants - Appellees, and ROSS STORE, INCORPORATED, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis III, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-01328-TSE-IDD) Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 22, 2011 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Xuli Zhang, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Charnoff, REES BROOME, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Xuli Zhang appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Zhang v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-01328-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed May 17, 2011 & entered May 31, 2011). We deny Zhang’s motion to supplement the record and compel discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
