Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. McNeair, 11-6232 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-6232 Visitors: 14
Filed: May 04, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6232 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR, Defendant – Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (4:96-cr-00070-JAB-1) Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011 Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey Dennard M
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 11-6232


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                Plaintiff – Appellee,

          v.

JEFFREY DENNARD MCNEAIR,

                Defendant – Appellant.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Salisbury. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
Chief District Judge. (4:96-cr-00070-JAB-1)


Submitted:   April 28, 2011                   Decided:   May 4, 2011


Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Jeffrey Dennard McNeair, Appellant Pro Se.      Robert Michael
Hamilton,   Angela  Hewlett Miller,   Assistant United  States
Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina; Paul Alexander Weinman,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Winston-Salem, North
Carolina, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

           Jeffrey Dennard McNeair appeals the district court’s

order   denying   his    18   U.S.C.   § 3582(c)   (2006)   motion   for   a

sentence reduction.        We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.       Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.        United States v. McNeair, No. 4:96-cr-

00070-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 28, 2011).              We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

                                                                 AFFIRMED




                                       2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer