Filed: Jun. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6233 PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. WADE, Sheriff; D. ROYAL, Supervisor Classification; MR. WALKER, Classification and others to be named later; DEPUTY FERGUSON, Defendants - Appellees, and GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections (DOC) in their individual and official capacities; HENRICO COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6233 PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. M. WADE, Sheriff; D. ROYAL, Supervisor Classification; MR. WALKER, Classification and others to be named later; DEPUTY FERGUSON, Defendants - Appellees, and GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections (DOC) in their individual and official capacities; HENRICO COUNTY MUNICIPALITY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the E..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6233
PAUL CLEVELAND THOMPSON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. WADE, Sheriff; D. ROYAL, Supervisor Classification; MR.
WALKER, Classification and others to be named later; DEPUTY
FERGUSON,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of
Corrections (DOC) in their individual and official
capacities; HENRICO COUNTY MUNICIPALITY,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:10-cv-00174-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Cleveland Thompson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa H. Leiner,
HARMAN, CLAYTOR, CORRIGAN & WELLMAN, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Paul Cleveland Thompson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Thompson v. Wade, No. 2:10-cv-00174-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va.
Jan. 18, 2011). We deny Thompson’s motion for a declaratory
judgment and for a preliminary and a permanent injunction. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3