Filed: Jun. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6259 LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL T. BELL; SANDRA F. THOMAS; PAUL TAYLOR; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER O'NEAL; GEORGE KENWORTHY, Superintendent, Defendants – Appellees, and THEODIS BECK, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decide
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6259 LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL T. BELL; SANDRA F. THOMAS; PAUL TAYLOR; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER O'NEAL; GEORGE KENWORTHY, Superintendent, Defendants – Appellees, and THEODIS BECK, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D) Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6259
LARRY KEITH GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL T. BELL; SANDRA F. THOMAS; PAUL TAYLOR;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER O'NEAL; GEORGE KENWORTHY,
Superintendent,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THEODIS BECK,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D)
Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011
Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Keith Green, Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Keith Green seeks to appeal the dismissal of one
defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Green
seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3