Filed: Aug. 30, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6389 TERRY AJ LYSLORD-DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:11-cv-00068-sgw-mfu) Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam. Terry AJ Lyslord-Duncan, Appellant Pro Se.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6389 TERRY AJ LYSLORD-DUNCAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:11-cv-00068-sgw-mfu) Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam. Terry AJ Lyslord-Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6389
TERRY AJ LYSLORD-DUNCAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:11-cv-00068-sgw-mfu)
Submitted: August 25, 2011 Decided: August 30, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam.
Terry AJ Lyslord-Duncan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Terry AJ Lyslord-Duncan appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his action brought pursuant to the Americans
with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 2005 &
Supp. 2011). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Lyslord-Duncan v. Bank of America, No. 7:11-cv-
00068-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2011). We deny Lyslord-
Duncan’s motions for a transcript at government expense, to
terminate the PLRA application, to appoint counsel, and for
abeyance and we dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2