Filed: Dec. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6991 BRYAN MAXWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JAMES N. CROSS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00098-IMK-JES) Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011 Before SHEDD, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryan Maxwell, Appell
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6991 BRYAN MAXWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JAMES N. CROSS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00098-IMK-JES) Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011 Before SHEDD, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bryan Maxwell, Appella..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6991
BRYAN MAXWELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
JAMES N. CROSS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:10-cv-00098-IMK-JES)
Submitted: December 12, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011
Before SHEDD, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bryan Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bryan Maxwell, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241
(West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Maxwell v. Cross, No.
1:10-cv-00098-IMK-JES (N.D.W. Va. July 22, 2011). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2