Filed: Dec. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7153 PATRICK GUESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution; TIMOTHY RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Institution; JON OZMINT, Agency Director; JERRY G. ALEXANDER, Captain; MS. MIDDLEBROOK, Administration Tyger River Correctional Institution; GARY LANE, Assistant Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution; LAURA CALDWELL, Tyger River Correctional Institution; Ms. D. MANESS, Defendant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7153 PATRICK GUESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution; TIMOTHY RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Institution; JON OZMINT, Agency Director; JERRY G. ALEXANDER, Captain; MS. MIDDLEBROOK, Administration Tyger River Correctional Institution; GARY LANE, Assistant Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution; LAURA CALDWELL, Tyger River Correctional Institution; Ms. D. MANESS, Defendants..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7153
PATRICK GUESS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CECILIA REYNOLDS, Warden, Kershaw Correctional Institution;
TIMOTHY RILEY, Warden, Tyger River Institution; JON OZMINT,
Agency Director; JERRY G. ALEXANDER, Captain; MS.
MIDDLEBROOK, Administration Tyger River Correctional
Institution; GARY LANE, Assistant Warden, Tyger River
Correctional Institution; LAURA CALDWELL, Tyger River
Correctional Institution; Ms. D. MANESS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(9:10-cv-01161-TLW)
Submitted: December 6, 2011 Decided: December 15, 2011
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Guess, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II,
Daniel C. Plyler, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Guess appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Guess v. Reynolds, No. 9:10-01161-TLW (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 2011). We
deny Guess’ motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2