U.S. v. JENNELL, 10-7366. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110120146
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 20, 2011
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vincent Jennell, Jr., appeals a district court order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Jennell , No. 7:02-cr-00032-jct-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented i
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Vincent Jennell, Jr., appeals a district court order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Jennell , No. 7:02-cr-00032-jct-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Vincent Jennell, Jr., appeals a district court order denying his motion for an evidentiary hearing and appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court's order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v. Jennell, No. 7:02-cr-00032-jct-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
