U.S. v. SHEALEY, 10-4810. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110217097
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 17, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donald Stanton Shealey appeals the district court's order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shealey , No. 5:08-cr-00282-F-2 (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befo
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donald Stanton Shealey appeals the district court's order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shealey , No. 5:08-cr-00282-F-2 (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials befor..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Donald Stanton Shealey appeals the district court's order denying his motion for return of property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Shealey, No. 5:08-cr-00282-F-2 (E.D.N.C. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
