Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. TRUESDALE, 10-7329 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: infco20110308116 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 08, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alvin Bernard Truesdale appeals from the district court's orders (1) denying his motions for leave to file a response to counsel's statement of his noneligibility for a sentence reduction, for a copy of his presentence report, to appoint new counsel based on a conflict of interest, and for judicial notice, and (2) granting his attorney's motion to withdraw as counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
More

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Bernard Truesdale appeals from the district court's orders (1) denying his motions for leave to file a response to counsel's statement of his noneligibility for a sentence reduction, for a copy of his presentence report, to appoint new counsel based on a conflict of interest, and for judicial notice, and (2) granting his attorney's motion to withdraw as counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Truesdale's motion for appointment of counsel, and we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Truesdale, No. 3:92-cr-00034-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 7 & 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer