McKEEVER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 10-1648. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110315083
Visitors: 1
Filed: Mar. 15, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Novella J. McKeever appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny McKeever a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart , 434 F.3d 650 , 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). We have thorough
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Novella J. McKeever appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny McKeever a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart , 434 F.3d 650 , 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). We have thoroughl..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Novella J. McKeever appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny McKeever a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. We must uphold the decision to deny benefits if the decision is supported by substantial evidence and the correct law was applied. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006); Johnson v. Barnhart, 434 F.3d 650, 653 (4th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties' briefs, the administrative record, and the materials submitted in the joint appendix, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See McKeever v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 3:09-cv-00339-JRS (E.D. Va. April 14, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
