U.S. v. RILEY, 10-6974. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110321118
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Riley's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riley , No. 3:98-cr-00101-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2010). We dispense with oral arg
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Riley's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riley , No. 3:98-cr-00101-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argu..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Darryl Glen Riley appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Riley's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Riley, No. 3:98-cr-00101-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. June 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
