U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 09-7484. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110331087
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 31, 2011
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Demetrius Marcus Williams appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-6 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2009).
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Demetrius Marcus Williams appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams , No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-6 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2009). ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Demetrius Marcus Williams appeals the district court's orders denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, No. 2:95-cr-00193-REP-6 (E.D. Va. July 22, 2009).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
FootNotes
* We note that the district court lacked the authority to consider Williams's motion for reconsideration. See United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 130 S.Ct. 3530 (2010).
Source: Leagle
