MAUPIN v. HOWARD COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, 10-1895. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110518112
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 01, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. ORDER The Court amends its opinion filed April 1, 2011, as follows: On page 2, second line of text — the words "granting summary judgment for the defendants" are substituted for the words "dismissing her civil complaint." PER CURIAM: Michelle Maupin appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment for the defendants. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reaso
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. ORDER The Court amends its opinion filed April 1, 2011, as follows: On page 2, second line of text — the words "granting summary judgment for the defendants" are substituted for the words "dismissing her civil complaint." PER CURIAM: Michelle Maupin appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment for the defendants. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reason..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
ORDER
The Court amends its opinion filed April 1, 2011, as follows:
On page 2, second line of text — the words "granting summary judgment for the defendants" are substituted for the words "dismissing her civil complaint."
PER CURIAM:
Michelle Maupin appeals the magistrate judge's order granting summary judgment for the defendants.* We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Maupin v. Howard Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:08-cv-02203-BPG (D. Md. July 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
FootNotes
* This case was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties' consent pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).
Source: Leagle
