ENWONWU v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, 10-2329. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110607123
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jun. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leopold O. V. Enwonwu appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1983, and 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. , No. 3:10-cv-00858-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny the motion
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Leopold O. V. Enwonwu appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1983, and 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. , No. 3:10-cv-00858-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny the motion f..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Leopold O. V. Enwonwu appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Enwonwu v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., No. 3:10-cv-00858-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 2010). We deny the motion for summary reversal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
