VEIGA v. SUNTRUST BANK, 11-1219. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111017078
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 17, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aaron Holsey appeals the order of the magistrate judge approving the settlement of this class action lawsuit and rejecting Holsey's objection to the settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, Veiga v. Holsey , No. 1:09-cv-02815-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 2011, entered Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Aaron Holsey appeals the order of the magistrate judge approving the settlement of this class action lawsuit and rejecting Holsey's objection to the settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, Veiga v. Holsey , No. 1:09-cv-02815-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 2011, entered Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented ..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Aaron Holsey appeals the order of the magistrate judge approving the settlement of this class action lawsuit and rejecting Holsey's objection to the settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, Veiga v. Holsey, No. 1:09-cv-02815-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 2011, entered Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
