FRANCIS v. WOODY, 11-6959. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111018120
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Romaine Francis appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody , No. 3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequatel
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Romaine Francis appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody , No. 3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Romaine Francis appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment for the Appellees on his various 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Francis v. Woody, No. 3:09-cv-00235-REP (E.D. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
