HARTY v. LUIHN FOUR, INC., 10-2375. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111116097
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 16, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 16, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Owen Harty appeals the district court's orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc. , No. 5:10-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2010; Nov. 30, 2
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Owen Harty appeals the district court's orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc. , No. 5:10-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2010; Nov. 30, 20..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Owen Harty appeals the district court's orders dismissing his claim arising under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189 (2006), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harty v. Luihn Four, Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00107-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 13, 2010; Nov. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
