HEARN INSULATION AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, INC. v. BONILLA, 11-1118. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111206096
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 06, 2011
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hearn Insulation and Improvement Company, Inc., appeals the district court's order denying its motion for attorney's fees incurred in its action against Carlos Bonilla and his company, Premium Construction Services Corporation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hearn Insulation
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hearn Insulation and Improvement Company, Inc., appeals the district court's order denying its motion for attorney's fees incurred in its action against Carlos Bonilla and his company, Premium Construction Services Corporation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hearn Insulation a..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Hearn Insulation and Improvement Company, Inc., appeals the district court's order denying its motion for attorney's fees incurred in its action against Carlos Bonilla and his company, Premium Construction Services Corporation. We have reviewed the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hearn Insulation and Improvement Co., Inc. v. Bonilla, No. 8:09-cv-00990-AW (D. Md. Jan. 21, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
