U.S. v. BROWN, 11-7123. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111223092
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 23, 2011
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Arthur Brown appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown , No. 3:92-cr-00270-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mater
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: William Arthur Brown appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown , No. 3:92-cr-00270-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Arthur Brown appeals the district court's order denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brown, No. 3:92-cr-00270-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
