Filed: Jul. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1486 WILLIAM NORKUNAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PARK ROAD SHOPPING CENTER, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC) Submitted: June 8, 2012 Decided: July 6, 2012 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas B. Bacon,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1486 WILLIAM NORKUNAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PARK ROAD SHOPPING CENTER, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC) Submitted: June 8, 2012 Decided: July 6, 2012 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas B. Bacon, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1486
WILLIAM NORKUNAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PARK ROAD SHOPPING CENTER, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney,
District Judge. (3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC)
Submitted: June 8, 2012 Decided: July 6, 2012
Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Bacon, THOMAS B. BACON, PA, Cooper City, Florida;
Christopher D. Lane, Clemmons, North Carolina, for Appellant. G.
Bryan Adams, III, Philip M. Van Hoy, VAN HOY, REUTLINGER, ADAMS
& DUNN, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
William Norkunas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing for lack of standing his claims under Title III of
the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181-12189
(2006). We have carefully reviewed the parties’ briefs and the
joint appendix and find no legal or factual basis to reverse the
district court’s conclusion that Norkunas failed to plead facts
sufficient to state an actual or imminent injury or to question
in this case the court’s refusal to broaden the bases for
Article III standing. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Norkunas v. Park Road Shopping
Ctr., Inc., No. 3:10-cv-00210-FDW-DSC (W.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 2011).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2