Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Haleh Merrikh, 11-1610 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-1610 Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1610 IN RE: HALEH MERRIKH, Debtor, - QUINCY PLAZA, L.C., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HALEH MERRIKH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00164-CMH-IDD; 09-18890-SSM; 10-01024- SSM) Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1610 IN RE: HALEH MERRIKH, Debtor, ------------------------------------- QUINCY PLAZA, L.C., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HALEH MERRIKH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00164-CMH-IDD; 09-18890-SSM; 10-01024- SSM) Submitted: January 31, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher Stuart Moffitt, LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER S. MOFFITT, P.C.L., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Jeffery S. Romanick, A. Charles Dean, GROSS & ROMANICK, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Haleh Merrikh appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to extend time to file an appellate brief and dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Quincy Plaza, L.C. v. Merrikh (In re Merrikh), Nos. 1:11-cv-00164-CMH-IDD; 09-18890-SSM; 10-01024-SSM (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2011; entered May 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer