Filed: Jan. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1799 DOUGLAS LIBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PARKERSBURG CITY POLICE; “SANTA CLAUS”; DALLAS DONALDSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (6:10-cv-00558) Submitted: December 29, 2011 Decided: January 5,2012 Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1799 DOUGLAS LIBERT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PARKERSBURG CITY POLICE; “SANTA CLAUS”; DALLAS DONALDSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph R. Goodwin, Chief District Judge. (6:10-cv-00558) Submitted: December 29, 2011 Decided: January 5,2012 Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed b..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1799
DOUGLAS LIBERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PARKERSBURG CITY POLICE; “SANTA CLAUS”; DALLAS DONALDSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (6:10-cv-00558)
Submitted: December 29, 2011 Decided: January 5,2012
Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Libert, Appellant Pro Se. Sylvester Allen Hill, Jr.,
Joseph W. Hunter, MANNION & GRAY, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Douglas Libert appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Libert v.
Parkersburg City Police, No. 6:10-cv-00558 (S.D.W. Va. June 29,
2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2