Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Warren Gladden v. U.S. Department of the Army, 11-1981 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-1981 Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1981 WARREN K. GLADDEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, John McHugh, Secretary, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-01793-PJM) Submitted: March 13, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012 Before DIAZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished pe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1981 WARREN K. GLADDEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, John McHugh, Secretary, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:10-cv-01793-PJM) Submitted: March 13, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012 Before DIAZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren K. Gladden, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Ronald Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Warren K. Gladden appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in Gladden’s action filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gladden v. U.S. Dep’t of the Army, No. 8:10-cv-01793-PJM (D. Md. July 13, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer