Filed: Mar. 29, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2119 MORRIS B. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT INC; DWIGHT ALFORD; BLAKE ALFORD; RAY CREECH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. William A. Webb, Magistrate Judge. (5:10-cv-00313-WW) Submitted: March 20, 2012 Decided: March 29, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2119 MORRIS B. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT INC; DWIGHT ALFORD; BLAKE ALFORD; RAY CREECH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. William A. Webb, Magistrate Judge. (5:10-cv-00313-WW) Submitted: March 20, 2012 Decided: March 29, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per cur..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-2119 MORRIS B. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT INC; DWIGHT ALFORD; BLAKE ALFORD; RAY CREECH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. William A. Webb, Magistrate Judge. (5:10-cv-00313-WW) Submitted: March 20, 2012 Decided: March 29, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Morris B. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra W. Mitterling, RAGSDALE & LIGGETT, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Morris B. Campbell appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging employment discrimination for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. Commercial Equipment Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00313-WW (E.D.N.C. Sept. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2