Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7509 LARRY K. GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL T. BELL; SANDRA F. THOMAS; PAUL TAYLOR; C/O O’NEAL; GEORGE KENWORTHY, Superintendent, Defendants – Appellees, and THEODIS BECK, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7509 LARRY K. GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MICHAEL T. BELL; SANDRA F. THOMAS; PAUL TAYLOR; C/O O’NEAL; GEORGE KENWORTHY, Superintendent, Defendants – Appellees, and THEODIS BECK, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7509
LARRY K. GREEN, a/k/a Said Abdullah Hakim,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL T. BELL; SANDRA F. THOMAS; PAUL TAYLOR; C/O O’NEAL;
GEORGE KENWORTHY, Superintendent,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
THEODIS BECK,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:10-ct-03003-D)
Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Keith Green, Appellant Pro Se. Oliver Gray Wheeler, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Keith Green seeks to appeal the district court’s
order dismissing certain claims and defendants in Green’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) suit. This court may exercise jurisdiction
only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Green seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3