Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7579 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WARREN SANDERS, a/k/a New York Mike, a/k/a Charlie Brown, a/k/a William McKinney, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00086-1) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed b
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7579 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WARREN SANDERS, a/k/a New York Mike, a/k/a Charlie Brown, a/k/a William McKinney, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00086-1) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7579 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WARREN SANDERS, a/k/a New York Mike, a/k/a Charlie Brown, a/k/a William McKinney, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00086-1) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Warren Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Steven Loew, Assistant United States Attorneys, Miller A. Bushong, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Warren Sanders appeals the district court’s order reducing his sentence, on the court’s own motion, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Sanders, No. 3:03-cr-00086-1 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2