Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jorge Galeas, Jr. v. L. Hamilton, 11-7610 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-7610 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7610 JORGE GALEAS, JR., Plaintiff – Appellant, v. L. HAMILTON, Transportation Officer, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00587-RJC) Submitted: March 15, 2012 Decided: March 20, 2012 Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge Affirmed by unpublished
More
                              UNPUBLISHED

                  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                      FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                              No. 11-7610


JORGE GALEAS, JR.,

                      Plaintiff – Appellant,

          v.

L. HAMILTON, Transportation Officer,

                      Defendant - Appellee.



Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.     Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00587-RJC)


Submitted:   March 15, 2012                 Decided:   March 20, 2012


Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Jorge Galeas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

          Jorge Galeas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1) (2006).     We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error.     Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.      Galeas v. Hamilton, No. 3:11-cv-00587-

RJC (W.D.N.C. Nov. 29, 2011).         We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.



                                                            AFFIRMED




                                  2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer