Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jose Mora, 11-7673 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-7673 Visitors: 35
Filed: Apr. 30, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7673 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSE JESUS MORA, a/k/a Jose Jesus Nuesslein, a/k/a Joe Mora, a/k/a Jose Jesus Neusslein, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cr-00062-RAJ-JEB-1) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affi
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7673 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSE JESUS MORA, a/k/a Jose Jesus Nuesslein, a/k/a Joe Mora, a/k/a Jose Jesus Neusslein, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:07-cr-00062-RAJ-JEB-1) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Jesus Mora, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jose Mora appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend special conditions of supervision and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and to expedite. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny appointment of counsel, deny Mora’s motion to expedite as moot, and affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Mora, No. 2:07-cr-00062-RAJ-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer