Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

National Benefit Life Ins v. Winston Spence, Jr., 12-1060 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1060 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 01, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1060 NATIONAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WINSTON L. SPENCE, JR., Individually and as parent and next friend of J.S., a minor, Defendant – Appellant, and JAYSON SPENCE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00031-JPB) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: Ju
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1060 NATIONAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WINSTON L. SPENCE, JR., Individually and as parent and next friend of J.S., a minor, Defendant – Appellant, and JAYSON SPENCE, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00031-JPB) Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 7, 2012 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Winston L. Spence, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Charity K. Flynn, SPILMAN, THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Winston L. Spence, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to National Benefit Life Insurance Company and determining that the proceeds of Silvana Sital’s life insurance policy should be divided equally between her sons, Jayson Spence, an adult, and J.S., a minor. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nat’l Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. Spence, Case No. 3:11-cv-00031-JPB (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer