Filed: Jun. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1162 WHITNEY LASSITER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Whitney Lassiter,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1162 WHITNEY LASSITER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Whitney Lassiter, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1162 WHITNEY LASSITER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: June 11, 2012 Decided: June 21, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Whitney Lassiter, Appellant Pro Se. Scott William Kezman, Mark Edward Warmbier, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Whitney Lassiter appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment and dismissing her claims and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lassiter v. Huntington Ingalls Indus., Inc., No. 4:11-cv-00101-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2012). We grant Lassiter’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
