Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Paula George v. Ray Mabus, 12-1254 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1254 Visitors: 63
Filed: May 01, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1254 PAULA D. GEORGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00106-BO) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paula D. George, Appellant
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1254 PAULA D. GEORGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RAY MABUS, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:11-cv-00106-BO) Submitted: April 26, 2012 Decided: May 1, 2012 Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paula D. George, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paula D. George sued her employer, the Secretary of the Navy, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp. 2011). She appeals the district court’s order granting her employer’s motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. George v. Mabus, No. 4:11-cv- 00106-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2012; Feb. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer