Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ronald Robertson v. Flowers Baking Company, 12-1520 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1520 Visitors: 44
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1520 RONALD LEE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF LYNCHBURG, LLC, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Lee Rob
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1520 RONALD LEE ROBERTSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FLOWERS BAKING CO. OF LYNCHBURG, LLC, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC) Submitted: July 19, 2012 Decided: July 23, 2012 Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Lee Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Parker Dunlaevy, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Kevin Patrick Hishta, Brittni A. Pitts, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Atlanta, Georgia; Kristine H. Smith, EDMUNDS & WILLIAMS, PC, Lynchburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Lee Robertson appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his employment discrimination action and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robertson v. Flowers Banking Co. of Lynchburg, LLC, No. 6:11-cv-00013-NKM-BWC (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, Apr. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer