Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joseph Wojcicki v. Aiken Technical College, 12-2086 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2086 Visitors: 22
Filed: Dec. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2086 JOSEPH WOJCICKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; SUSAN A. WINSOR, ex Graham ATC president; WILLIAM TILT, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; THOMAS DESROCHER, Program Coordinator; LEE POWELL, Human Resources Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00461
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2086 JOSEPH WOJCICKI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AIKEN TECHNICAL COLLEGE; SUSAN A. WINSOR, ex Graham ATC president; WILLIAM TILT, Associate Vice President of Technical Education; THOMAS DESROCHER, Program Coordinator; LEE POWELL, Human Resources Director, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, Chief District Judge. (1:06-cv-00461-MBS) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 26, 2012 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Wojcicki, Appellant Pro Se. Charles J. Boykin, Kimberly Ann Gertner, BOYKIN & DAVIS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Joseph Wojcicki appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and to dismiss his employment discrimination complaint, and denying Wojcicki’s motions for relief from that judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wojcicki v. Aiken Technical Coll., No. 1:06-cv-00461-MBS (D.S.C. filed Sept. 30, 2011 & entered Oct. 3, 2011; Aug. 21, 2012). We deny Wojcicki’s motion to add three new defendants to this action. Out of an abundance of caution, though, we grant Wojcicki’s motion to seal the documents filed in this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer