Filed: May 25, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6082 WILLIE WORLEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANNY STANLEY, Sign Plant Manager; TOMMY MAY, Assistant Plant Manager; MR. PEARSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03175-FL) Submitted: April 20, 2012 Decided: May 25, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by un
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6082 WILLIE WORLEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANNY STANLEY, Sign Plant Manager; TOMMY MAY, Assistant Plant Manager; MR. PEARSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03175-FL) Submitted: April 20, 2012 Decided: May 25, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unp..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6082 WILLIE WORLEY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DANNY STANLEY, Sign Plant Manager; TOMMY MAY, Assistant Plant Manager; MR. PEARSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03175-FL) Submitted: April 20, 2012 Decided: May 25, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Worley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Yvette Harper, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Willie D. Worley, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Worley v. Stanley, No. 5:09-ct-03175-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
